News

Santa Rosa Punts Ordinance to Prevent Discrimination Against Low-Income Renters (CA)

Santa Rosa Punts Ordinance to Prevent Discrimination Against Low-Income Renters

"A statewide movement to forbid discrimination against low-income home renters hit a roadblock in Santa Rose on Tuesday.

Asked by the city’s housing department to adopt a local law that would make it illegal for landlords to discriminate against renters with federal housing vouchers to help them pay monthly rent, Santa Rosa City Council members punted.

Rather than vote on an anti-discrimination ordinance, council members wavered after property managers objected and decided to delay any resolution on the measure until Sept. 24.

The ordinance would offer protection for about 2,000 city residents, including 50 fire survivors and some 400 veterans who have been issued housing vouchers.

Heather Dunn, a supporter of the law who helps veterans in search of housing, said the ordinance “isn’t forcing anyone” to rent to tenants who would pay with Section 8 vouchers. “It’s about giving them an opportunity to apply.”

Dunn said she’s working with 35 veterans seeking housing with vouchers. It’s taking 120 to 160 days to find housing for them, she said.

The city’s ordinance mirrors California legislation, which passed the state Senate in June and is pending in the Assembly.

Similar local statutes already have passed in Novato, San Rafael and Santa Monica, among other California cities.

Another is being considered in San Jose.

Despite this statewide momentum, and a severe shortage of affordable housing in Santa Rosa exacerbated by the 2017 Tubbs fire, the ordinance was sent back to the drawing board for revisions. The decision to kick the can down the road was prompted by concerns from landlords who said the city did not consult them closely enough. They fear a loss of income resulting from being forced to work with tenants who have federal subsidies because of the purported red tape involved.

“I’m not opposed to the mission” of providing housing assistance, said Keith Becker, who owns a property management firm in Santa Rosa told council, “but I am opposed to this ordinance, which forces individual housing providers to enter into a contractual relationship with a governmental agency, with all the inherent and predictable difficulties of doing so.”

Shelley Clark, a housing policy attorney with Legal Aid of Sonoma County, cited the plight of the dozens of people who lost homes in the wildfire two years ago, then were allocated housing vouchers by Rebuilding Our Community Sonoma County..."

Continue reading

Topics:
  • Pro Bono/Legal Services
  • Housing