skip to content
11-14 of 14

Troy D. v. Mickens - Brief in Opposition

June 2, 2011

USDC for the District of New Jersey

Plaintiffs' Brief In Opposition To Defendants' Motions To Dismiss And In The Alternative For Summary Judgment

Troy D. v. Mickens - Opinion / Motion to Dismiss

August 25, 2011

USDC for the District of New Jersey

JJC Defendants and Mental Health Providers Motions for Summary Judgment is denied.

Westefer v. Snyder - Findings

July 20, 2010

USDC for the Southern District of Illinois

Plaintiffs seek relief in this case under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, alleging that Defendants have violated their right to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution by employing constitutionally inadequate procedures when assigning IDOC inmates to the supermax prison at Tamms.

Westefer v. Snyder - Judgment

July 20, 2010

USDC for the Southern District of Illinois

A class of all inmates in the custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections who have been transferred to the Tamms Closed Maximum Security Facility ("Tamms CMAX") since January 1, 1998, and all inmates in the custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections who will be transferred to Tamms CMAX, injunctive relief is awarded to Plaintiffs

11-14 of 14
Login
Pro Bono and legal aid attorney resources - Pro Bono Net
LawHelp.org/
Legal info for the public